COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation.

What people with cancer should know: https://www.cancer.gov/coronavirus

Guidance for cancer researchers: https://www.cancer.gov/coronavirus-researchers

Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov

Get the latest research information from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus

The Next Step: Worksite Cancer Screening and Nutrition Intervention

Program Highlights

Purpose: Worksite program designed to increase colorectal cancer screening and promote healthy dietary behaviors. (1999)
Age: 19-39 years (Young Adults), 40-65 years (Adults), 65+ years (Older Adults)
Sex: Male
Race/Ethnicity: Black - not of Hispanic or Latino origin, White - not of Hispanic or Latino origin
Program Focus: Awareness building and Behavior Modification
Population Focus: Employees
Program Area: Colorectal Cancer Screening, Diet/Nutrition
Delivery Location: Home, Workplace
Community Type: Suburban, Urban/Inner City
Program Materials

Preview or download materials

Program Scores

EBCCP Scores
(1.0 = low   5.0 = high)
RE-AIM Scores
Beginning in 2012, new programs are scored on RE-AIM criteria. This program was posted prior to the inclusion of RE-AIM scores and does not have these scores included. Click on the information icon next to "RE-AIM Scores" above to learn more about RE-AIM.
Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer. Prevention and early detection have the potential to decrease morbidity and prevent premature death from this disease. Colorectal cancer screening combined with a healthful diet low in fat and high in fiber, fruits, and vegetables may reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer and are part of a national cancer control strategy. Colorectal cancer interventions that target high-risk populations hold promise because these persons may be motivated to change their behavior. Moreover, worksite-based nutrition and screening interventions for high risk populations show promise because they are accessible and convenient, can be enhanced by co-worker support, and provide opportunities for reinforcement and environmental supports for healthy eating.
Next Step is a workplace program that aims to increase colorectal cancer screening and promote healthy dietary behaviors. The screening promotion component consists of an invitation flyer and a personalized educational booklet. The booklet explains screening procedures, presents cancer statistics, and includes a personalized screening schedule. The dietary component consists of five nutrition education classes delivered in the workplace, with mailed self-help materials. In the second year of the program, employees receive personalized feedback to encourage maintenance of first-year gains. Worksite cafeterias also display posters and brochures relaying simple messages about low fat, high-fiber eating.
This program uses an intervention approach recommended by the Community Preventive Services Task Force: small media interventions (Colorectal Cancer Screening). This program also uses the following intervention approach for which the Community Preventive Services Task Force finds insufficient evidence: group education interventions (Colorectal Cancer Screening). Insufficient evidence means the available studies do not provide sufficient evidence to determine if the intervention is or is not effective. This does not mean that the intervention does not work. It means that additional research is needed to determine whether the intervention is effective.

The Next Step program is delivered over two years. The educational booklet is delivered once per year. Five, one-hour nutrition education classes are held during the first year of the program. Training for delivering the nutrition classes is 1.5 days.
Study participants were male automobile industry workers aged 19-85 years from Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, New York and Pennsylvania. Of the participants 95% were Caucasian (including an unspecified number of Hispanics), 3% were African American, 2% were classified as "other". The racial/ethnic distribution represented the proportions working in the particular segment of the auto industry being offered the screening program. A total of 38% were retired; and 24% had a history of polyps or colorectal cancer.
The intervention is suitable for implementation in the workplace and the home.
The Leaner the Better screening flyer, ColoRecord educational booklet, Fat & Fiber packet (including all the handouts), The Next Step Procedures Manual, and The Leaner Weigh instructor and participant manual are required. Costs associated with the program are not provided.

Twenty-eight automobile industry worksites were randomized to receive the Next Step program or a company-sponsored screening program. Participants in the Next Step program received an enhanced screening program and a diet-change program. To promote screening, employees received a personalized educational booklet. A follow-up companion telephone call was made to review the booklet and screening schedule, and highlight cancer risks and facts. To promote healthier eating, five nutrition education classes were offered during work time and employees were also mailed self-help materials. In the second year, employees received personalized feedback to encourage maintenance of first-year gains. The feedback consisted of a graphic comparison of the employee's diet to the USDA Food Guide Pyramid and motivational messages based on the employee's responses to a food frequency questionnaire. In addition, worksite cafeterias displayed posters and brochures relaying simple messages about low fat, high-fiber eating, and a quarterly newsletter was also mailed to employees' homes to promote and reinforce intervention strategies. Surveys to measure changes in dietary outcome and screening behavior were mailed at the end of the first and second year of the study.

Results indicated:

  • At Year 1 of the program, Next Step participants decreased their energy from fat, and increased their servings of fruits and vegetables.

Graph of Study Results

Graph of Study Results

  • At Years 1 and 2, Next Step participants increased their fiber consumption compared to control participants.

Graph of Study Results

  • At Year 2, Next Step participants had modest, but higher screening compliance (receiving all recommended examinations) and coverage (receiving at least one recommended examination) compared to participants in the control group.

Graph of Study Results

Primary
Secondary

Tilley BC, Glanz K, Kristal AR, Hirst K, Li S, Vernon SW, Myers R. (1999). Nutrition Intervention for High-Risk Auto Workers: Results of the Next Step Trial. Preventive Medicine, 28, 284-292.

Tilley BC, Vernon SW, Glanz K, Myers R, Sanders K, Lu M, Hirst K, Kristal AR, Smereka C, Sowers MF. (1997). Worksite Cancer Screening and Nutrition Intervention for High-Risk Auto Workers: Design and Baseline Findings of the Next Step Trial. Preventive Medicine, 26, 227-235.

Tilley BC, Vernon SW, Myers R, Glanz K, Lu M, Sanders K, Smereka C. (1995). Planning the Next Step: A Screening Promotion and Nutrition Intervention Trial in the Work Site. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 768, 296-299.

Vernon SW, Myers RE, Tilley BC. (1997). Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Factors Related to Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 6(10), 825-832.

Glanz K, Kristal AR, Tilley BC, Hirst K. (1998). Psychosocial Correlates of Healthful Diets among Male Auto Workers. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 7, 119-126.

Myers RE, Vernon SW, Tilley BC, Lu M, Watts BG. (1998). Intention to Screen for Colorectal Cancer among White Male Employees. Preventive Medicine, 27, 279-287.

Kristal AR, Glanz K, Tilley BC, Li S. (2000). Mediating Factors in Dietary Change: Understanding the Impact of a Worksite Nutrition Intervention. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 112-125.

Vernon SW, Myers RE, Tilley BC, Li S. (2001). Factors Associated with Perceived Risk in Automotive Employees at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 10, 35-43.

Watts BG, Vernon SW, Myers RE, Tilley BC. (2003). Intention to be Screened Over Time for Colorectal Cancer in Male Automotive Workers. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 12, 339-349.


(Be the first to write a review for this program)
NCI does not endorse nor recommend any commercial products, processes, or services, nor do they guarantee the success of programs made available on the site. The views and opinions of authors expressed on this website do not necessarily state or reflect those of the NCI, and may not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. Rather, the information is provided to help you make an informed decision about the best program options to meet your cancer control needs. Please see the disclaimer for further information.
Updated: 08/30/2011