COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation.

What people with cancer should know: https://www.cancer.gov/coronavirus

Guidance for cancer researchers: https://www.cancer.gov/coronavirus-researchers

Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov

Get the latest research information from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus

Pathways to Change

Program Synopsis

Designed to promote smoking cessation, this computer-based intervention delivers individually tailored reports with four sections: a description of the person’s stage of change and pros and cons for quitting, feedback on his or her use of change processes, a description of situations in which it is tempting to smoke, and strategies for taking small steps to progress to the next stage of change. The study showed higher smoking cessation rates.

Program Highlights

Purpose: Reports on a computer-base expert system intervention with the potential to increase successful smoking cessation. (2001)
Age: 19-39 years (Young Adults), 40-65 years (Adults), 65+ years (Older Adults)
Sex: Female, Male
Race/Ethnicity: Asian, Black - not of Hispanic or Latino origin, Hispanic or Latino, White - not of Hispanic or Latino origin
Program Focus: Smoking Cessation
Population Focus: Current Smokers
Program Area: Tobacco Control
Delivery Location: Home
Community Type: Rural, Suburban, Urban/Inner City
Program Materials

Preview and order the materials from the developer

Program Scores

EBCCP Scores
(1.0 = low   5.0 = high)
RE-AIM Scores
66.7%
N/A - Not Applicable
71.4%

Previous research has predicted that an estimated 500 million people will die from tobacco use. Modest breakthroughs in developing interventions for smokers could prevent millions of premature deaths and billions of lost years of life.

The program involves a computer-based support system that delivers individually tailored reports to help adults quit smoking. Each report is divided into four sections: (1) a description of the person's stage of change, including their pros and cons for quitting; (2) feedback on their use of change processes, noting how subjects compared to successful self-changers and to their previous assessment; (3) a description of situations in which it is tempting to smoke, with feedback on how to enhance self-confidence; and (4) strategies for taking small steps to progress to the next stage.

This program uses an intervention approach recommended by the Community Preventive Services Task Force: internet-based cessation interventions (Tobacco Control).

In the study, individualized, interactive computer reports were sent to participants at the start of the intervention, at month 3, and at month 6.

Study participants included adult smokers in Rhode Island households, recruited through random digit dialing. The study sample was predominantly Caucasian though also included people of African American, Asian, Hispanic and other origins.

 

The program can be delivered by mail to the home.

The Pathways to Change manual and assessment instruments are required.

The study tested a computer-based expert system intervention that has the potential to increase successful smoking cessation. The intervention is based on stages of change. Research on how people quit smoking on their own has identified five stages of change: pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance.

Participants completed a brief phone survey and were randomly assigned to an Expert System Intervention (ES) or an Assessment Only Condition (AS). Those assigned to the ES condition were mailed a series of three computer reports at the start of treatment and at 3 and 6 months. At 3 and 6 months, ES subjects were mailed a progress questionnaire.

Intervention follow-up took place at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the intervention.

Results of the study indicate the following:

  • Smoking cessation rates were significantly higher for the ES condition at each time interval (2.3 at 6 months, 3.5 at 12 months, 5.1 at 18 months, and 5.9 at 24 months).
  • Similarly, results for having quit for 7 days, 30 days, and 6 months at the 6, 12, 18, and 24 month marks reveal a significant difference between the AS and ES groups.
  • For subjects in the contemplation and preparation stages at baseline, the ES group outperformed the AS group at each of the four follow-ups. For subjects originally in the pre-contemplation stage, however, the ES did not produce greater abstinence until the 24-month follow-up. This is the type of delayed action effect that can be expected from a stage-matched intervention.

Graph of study results


(Be the first to write a review for this program)
NCI does not endorse nor recommend any commercial products, processes, or services, nor do they guarantee the success of programs made available on the site. The views and opinions of authors expressed on this website do not necessarily state or reflect those of the NCI, and may not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. Rather, the information is provided to help you make an informed decision about the best program options to meet your cancer control needs. Please see the disclaimer for further information.
Updated: 06/25/2020